The next potential NCAA bombshell

Discuss anything else athletic or non-athletic related that doesn't belong on the main Tulane athletics forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
tpstulane
Top of the WAVE
Posts: 26738
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:56 pm
Status: Offline

Players to be considered employees goes to court.

Understanding Johnson v. NCAA, the next case that could upend the college sports model

https://theathletic.com/3497617/2022/08 ... ed_article


Be proactive, being reactive is for losers..
Tulane Class of 1981
HoustonWave
Tsunami
Posts: 7493
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:27 pm
Status: Online

tpstulane wrote: Sat Aug 13, 2022 7:06 pm Players to be considered employees goes to court.

Understanding Johnson v. NCAA, the next case that could upend the college sports model

https://theathletic.com/3497617/2022/08 ... ed_article
Hopefully the courts will apply some common sense, and step back and assess the broader picture for college sports. The Greed Machine is very close to shutting down college athletics. If athletes have to be treated as employees, I suspect many schools, perhaps a majority of schools will shut down their athletic programs. Perhaps they’ll just sponsor club sports across the board—take us all the way back to where this all started.
Tulane is the University of Louisiana
anEngineer
Riptide
Posts: 2761
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:26 pm
Status: Offline

I can envision a scenario where the courts rule that the players don't have to attend class. They essentially become minor leaguers wearing school logos.
Wave755
Tsunami
Posts: 6236
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:04 pm
Status: Offline

An excellent & brief Villanova Law Review article on the implications of Johnson v. NCAA and legal analysis for the court denying the motion to dismiss of the NCAA. https://www.villanovalawreview.com/post ... son-v-ncaa
And, a college football players union next? Remember, in NCAA v. Alston the S. C. was unanimous in favor of the players on NIL.💡🤔
Last edited by Wave755 on Sun Aug 14, 2022 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HoustonWave
Tsunami
Posts: 7493
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:27 pm
Status: Online

Where’s the line? Are 18 year old high school students going to be employees because people pay to watch some high school games? Are the high schools violating child labor laws because of under-18 year old athletes? The money is much less, but the principals would seem
to be the same. Bizarre.
Tulane is the University of Louisiana
Wave755
Tsunami
Posts: 6236
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:04 pm
Status: Offline

HoustonWave wrote: Sun Aug 14, 2022 5:59 am Where’s the line? Are 18 year old high school students going to be employees because people pay to watch some high school games? Are the high schools violating child labor laws because of under-18 year old athletes? The money is much less, but the principals would seem
to be the same. Bizarre.
How the S. C. applies the Glatt v. Fox Searchlight factors to the present facts and circumstances of multi-billion dollar college football 🏈 and basketball 🏀 for whether athletes are “employees” will be the “ballgame” for if college athletics as we have known it for the past 100 years now comes to an end.
Last edited by Wave755 on Sun Aug 14, 2022 4:09 pm, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
wave97
Swell
Posts: 2225
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:08 pm
Status: Offline

Blah!
Post Reply