Tulsa Game Thread- TD gets game moved to 1:00
The game is Sunday at 2. It is on ESPN3. Work your magic and get it moved up an hour or two. Please!
Last edited by winwave on Fri Dec 29, 2017 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BAYWAVE&Sophandros are SPINELESS COWARDS
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
- Show Me
- Tsunami
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: Saint Bernard
- Status: Offline
The NFL moved the Saints to 3:25pm from noon to provide for Tulane fans. An hour or two wouldn’t work.winwave wrote:The game is Sunday at 2. It is on ESPN3. Work your magic and get it moved up an hour or two. Please!
Yes it would. If we start at 1 the game is over before 3 and your home in time to watch the Saints. Make it noon and you make it with plenty of time.
BAYWAVE&Sophandros are SPINELESS COWARDS
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
- Show Me
- Tsunami
- Posts: 5073
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: Saint Bernard
- Status: Offline
THe game is on national TV (ESPNU) so don’t expect any time change.winwave wrote:Yes it would. If we start at 1 the game is over before 3 and your home in time to watch the Saints. Make it noon and you make it with plenty of time.
It's on ESPN3.
BAYWAVE&Sophandros are SPINELESS COWARDS
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
-
- Wild Pelican
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:50 pm
- Location: Stamford, CT
- Status: Offline
Which is a streaming channel only. The game could be changed rather easily, though at this late date it might be tough to work out.winwave wrote:It's on ESPN3.
" If you laugh, you think, and you cry, that's a full day.." Jimmy V
All the necessary parties will be here well enough in advance for a move up an hour or two.
BAYWAVE&Sophandros are SPINELESS COWARDS
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9887
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
I can imagine Tulsa will be happy to accommodate us in moving the game time after what happened during football season.winwave wrote:All the necessary parties will be here well enough in advance for a move up an hour or two.
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
- GreenLantern
- Riptide
- Posts: 3444
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:41 pm
- Status: Offline
I have left a message for Mickey Loomis to call me the second he arrives at the office. I will insist that the Saints game be changed to an evening game so as not to interfere with Tulane-Tulsa.
-
- Swell
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:34 am
- Status: Offline
The temple result will have minimal to zero impact on current attendance. Saints or not. Too much losing for way too long. Still need some more eye openers.
- nawlinspete
- Riptide
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:43 pm
- Status: Offline
Wrong, we need to get fannies in the stands because we are playing well irrespective of the opponent. We can not be content with good attendance only for "quality" opponents.tpstulane wrote:Students away for the holidays also. Win on Sunday then SMU may get some new people in the stands. Quality opponent.
President Fitts , B of A , it's put up or forever hold your peace time . Make Tulane ATHLETICS relevant and top 30 again .
-
- Swell
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:34 am
- Status: Offline
Unfortunately we are mired in an attendance problem. Tulane hoops was basically run into the ground by the previous administration. Word of mouth travels slow. Nobody is paying attention yet. It is what it is.nawlinspete wrote:Wrong, we need to get fannies in the stands because we are playing well irrespective of the opponent. We can not be content with good attendance only for "quality" opponents.tpstulane wrote:Students away for the holidays also. Win on Sunday then SMU may get some new people in the stands. Quality opponent.
-
- Riptide
- Posts: 2714
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:26 pm
- Status: Offline
Great move. More of us should have thought of approaching the conflict from that direction.GreenLantern wrote:I have left a message for Mickey Loomis to call me the second he arrives at the office. I will insist that the Saints game be changed to an evening game so as not to interfere with Tulane-Tulsa.
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9887
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Do you guys stand at the bottom of a flight of stairs and try to make it to the top in one step? Who said anything about being content with good attendance only for quality opponents? We've had no attendance at all for ANY opponent for years. START with increasing attendance by playing well, then get bigger crowds for "quality opponents. Win those games and you start getting bigger crowds for all games. ITS A PROCESS. No wonder the "yoggies" call this the sad sack board.nawlinspete wrote:Wrong, we need to get fannies in the stands because we are playing well irrespective of the opponent. We can not be content with good attendance only for "quality" opponents.tpstulane wrote:Students away for the holidays also. Win on Sunday then SMU may get some new people in the stands. Quality opponent.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9887
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Not going to happen. Its New Years Eve. The NFL decided not to put any games in the normal Sunday Night Football slot. All games will be 1pm or 4:25pm ET starts.anEngineer wrote:Great move. More of us should have thought of approaching the conflict from that direction.GreenLantern wrote:I have left a message for Mickey Loomis to call me the second he arrives at the office. I will insist that the Saints game be changed to an evening game so as not to interfere with Tulane-Tulsa.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
-
- Swell
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:34 am
- Status: Offline
YaRobertM320 wrote:Do you guys stand at the bottom of a flight of stairs and try to make it to the top in one step? Who said anything about being content with good attendance only for quality opponents? We've had no attendance at all for ANY opponent for years. START with increasing attendance by playing well, then get bigger crowds for "quality opponents. Win those games and you start getting bigger crowds for all games. ITS A PROCESS. No wonder the "yoggies" call this the sad sack board.nawlinspete wrote:Wrong, we need to get fannies in the stands because we are playing well irrespective of the opponent. We can not be content with good attendance only for "quality" opponents.tpstulane wrote:Students away for the holidays also. Win on Sunday then SMU may get some new people in the stands. Quality opponent.
Tulane Women are on ESPNU SUNDAY at 11am vs USFShow Me wrote:THe game is on national TV (ESPNU) so don’t expect any time change.winwave wrote:Yes it would. If we start at 1 the game is over before 3 and your home in time to watch the Saints. Make it noon and you make it with plenty of time.
Be proactive, being reactive is for losers..
Tulane Class of 1981
Tulane Class of 1981
-
- Wild Pelican
- Posts: 13004
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:50 pm
- Location: Stamford, CT
- Status: Offline
Students away on holiday, people have a life, and the Saints game all work against a few thousand fans jumping on the band wagon for a game on New Years Eve. Of course we'd all like to see Fogelman packed, but it's highly unlikely to happen. Did anyone notice the attendance at Temple last night? Despite their #13 RPI ranking, it was abysmal.nawlinspete wrote:Wrong, we need to get fannies in the stands because we are playing well irrespective of the opponent. We can not be content with good attendance only for "quality" opponents.tpstulane wrote:Students away for the holidays also. Win on Sunday then SMU may get some new people in the stands. Quality opponent.
" If you laugh, you think, and you cry, that's a full day.." Jimmy V
-
- Swell
- Posts: 1097
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:34 am
- Status: Offline
DfromCT wrote:Students away on holiday, people have a life, and the Saints game all work against a few thousand fans jumping on the band wagon for a game on New Years Eve. Of course we'd all like to see Fogelman packed, but it's highly unlikely to happen. Did anyone notice the attendance at Temple last night? Despite their #13 RPI ranking, it was abysmal.nawlinspete wrote:Wrong, we need to get fannies in the stands because we are playing well irrespective of the opponent. We can not be content with good attendance only for "quality" opponents.tpstulane wrote:Students away for the holidays also. Win on Sunday then SMU may get some new people in the stands. Quality opponent.
I watched some of lsu at Memphis. Memphis still does extremely well. I bet there was close to 10k
- GreenLantern
- Riptide
- Posts: 3444
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:41 pm
- Status: Offline
Robert, suffering from post-Temple felicity, my original post that suggested we make demands to the Saints for a scheduling change was a failing attempt at sarcasm. Although I have grand hopes for Tulane athletics, none are in a realm which would allow directives to be given to or taken seriously by the NFL.RobertM320 wrote:Not going to happen. Its New Years Eve. The NFL decided not to put any games in the normal Sunday Night Football slot. All games will be 1pm or 4:25pm ET starts.anEngineer wrote:Great move. More of us should have thought of approaching the conflict from that direction.GreenLantern wrote:I have left a message for Mickey Loomis to call me the second he arrives at the office. I will insist that the Saints game be changed to an evening game so as not to interfere with Tulane-Tulsa.
It's a process. No doubt. I think what most are trying to analyze/debate here is whether we've got the right guys in place, that at the end of "the process" we have teams that are competing for conference championships. The last thing we all want is for a 3-5 year process to result in mediocre teams and/or a start of another process. So not trying to get to the top in one step, just making sure we can actually make it up the stairs.RobertM320 wrote:Do you guys stand at the bottom of a flight of stairs and try to make it to the top in one step? Who said anything about being content with good attendance only for quality opponents? We've had no attendance at all for ANY opponent for years. START with increasing attendance by playing well, then get bigger crowds for "quality opponents. Win those games and you start getting bigger crowds for all games. ITS A PROCESS. No wonder the "yoggies" call this the sad sack board.nawlinspete wrote:Wrong, we need to get fannies in the stands because we are playing well irrespective of the opponent. We can not be content with good attendance only for "quality" opponents.tpstulane wrote:Students away for the holidays also. Win on Sunday then SMU may get some new people in the stands. Quality opponent.
So we all have our definition of how may steps there are, how many we've taken thus far, how long it should take us to get to the top, and how many obstacles are in place. But we're definitely past the one step. WF has had 2 years and MD 1+ year.
RobertM320 wrote:Not going to happen. Its New Years Eve. The NFL decided not to put any games in the normal Sunday Night Football slot. All games will be 1pm or 4:25pm ET starts.anEngineer wrote:Great move. More of us should have thought of approaching the conflict from that direction.GreenLantern wrote:I have left a message for Mickey Loomis to call me the second he arrives at the office. I will insist that the Saints game be changed to an evening game so as not to interfere with Tulane-Tulsa.
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/nRFloeg.jpg)
God Bless Everyone!
I agree with your take but let's not be afraid to say "WINNING CHAMPIONSHIPS".netshorty wrote:It's a process. No doubt. I think what most are trying to analyze/debate here is whether we've got the right guys in place, that at the end of "the process" we have teams that are competing for conference championships. The last thing we all want is for a 3-5 year process to result in mediocre teams and/or a start of another process. So not trying to get to the top in one step, just making sure we can actually make it up the stairs.RobertM320 wrote:Do you guys stand at the bottom of a flight of stairs and try to make it to the top in one step? Who said anything about being content with good attendance only for quality opponents? We've had no attendance at all for ANY opponent for years. START with increasing attendance by playing well, then get bigger crowds for "quality opponents. Win those games and you start getting bigger crowds for all games. ITS A PROCESS. No wonder the "yoggies" call this the sad sack board.nawlinspete wrote:Wrong, we need to get fannies in the stands because we are playing well irrespective of the opponent. We can not be content with good attendance only for "quality" opponents.tpstulane wrote:Students away for the holidays also. Win on Sunday then SMU may get some new people in the stands. Quality opponent.
So we all have our definition of how may steps there are, how many we've taken thus far, how long it should take us to get to the top, and how many obstacles are in place. But we're definitely past the one step. WF has had 2 years and MD 1+ year.
BAYWAVE&Sophandros are SPINELESS COWARDS
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.