Re: Tulane at Syracuse
Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 2:28 pm
Whatever.tnelly15 wrote:Not necessarily their fault, but the point remains.
Whatever.tnelly15 wrote:Not necessarily their fault, but the point remains.
???Pullinmyhairout wrote:Whatever.tnelly15 wrote:Not necessarily their fault, but the point remains.
Looks that way.ExileWave wrote:'Cuse calling off the dogs with 10 minutes left? Hunt out, running the ball.
You are a monumental loser. You are saying something that's factually incorrect but you'd rather passively aggressively hate on those dealing in reality.OUG wrote:Donations pays for everything. No school funds athletics out of their general fund beyond a subsidy to balance the books. Everything else is just steering donations.sader24 wrote:OUG wrote:The difference in hiring a proven DC won't be the money. We found/are finding 70m for a stadium project. The issue will be finding a proven guy who wants to coach defense at a non-BCS school.sader24 wrote:I subscribe to the belief that you can't learn on the job at this level. While you're learning and getting better, so is everyone else so you're constantly behind. CJ isn't some 35 year old whiz with a tremendous amount of talent and aptitude that has to figure some stuff out. He's in his 50's and been at every level, if he doesn't have it yet, he's not finding it. His best bet is to fire his defensive coordinators and bring in a guy who has it and basically let him run the team while he recruits. I don't think that'll work b/c we don't have the money to bring someone in like that, but this setup isn't working.tpstulane wrote:We're not there yet. Coaches learning on the job, need an better OL and need tremendous work on the punt team to have a winning year next season.
This year still feels like 5-7 to me. Which was in the region of 5-7/7-5 that most predicted.
BS, we haven't come up with any of the money for the stadium, its all donations. We are paying CJ $600K which is absurd for a Div 1 Football Coach. The University still hasn't proven they are willing to invest in the football program or basketball program.
How do you think we were going to pay any big time coaches salary if we were going to get one? It's all just moving one pile of donations to another.
Administration defenders talking out of both sides of their mouths.jonathanjoseph wrote:You are a monumental loser. You are saying something that's factually incorrect but you'd rather passively aggressively hate on those dealing in reality.OUG wrote:Donations pays for everything. No school funds athletics out of their general fund beyond a subsidy to balance the books. Everything else is just steering donations.sader24 wrote:OUG wrote:The difference in hiring a proven DC won't be the money. We found/are finding 70m for a stadium project. The issue will be finding a proven guy who wants to coach defense at a non-BCS school.sader24 wrote: I subscribe to the belief that you can't learn on the job at this level. While you're learning and getting better, so is everyone else so you're constantly behind. CJ isn't some 35 year old whiz with a tremendous amount of talent and aptitude that has to figure some stuff out. He's in his 50's and been at every level, if he doesn't have it yet, he's not finding it. His best bet is to fire his defensive coordinators and bring in a guy who has it and basically let him run the team while he recruits. I don't think that'll work b/c we don't have the money to bring someone in like that, but this setup isn't working.
This year still feels like 5-7 to me. Which was in the region of 5-7/7-5 that most predicted.
BS, we haven't come up with any of the money for the stadium, its all donations. We are paying CJ $600K which is absurd for a Div 1 Football Coach. The University still hasn't proven they are willing to invest in the football program or basketball program.
How do you think we were going to pay any big time coaches salary if we were going to get one? It's all just moving one pile of donations to another.
I guess denial is an understandable reaction.
don't really know what your comment is about.tnelly15 wrote:???Pullinmyhairout wrote:Whatever.tnelly15 wrote:Not necessarily their fault, but the point remains.