Tulane at Syracuse
-
- Riptide
- Posts: 4667
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:09 pm
- Location: Bay Area, California
- Status: Offline
Red zone sucks too!
Another one. That's 30 yards in this drive.sader24 wrote:Late hit, stupid, CJ arguing with refs instead of jumping Davis' sh*t. They'll score before halftime.
Be proactive, being reactive is for losers..
Tulane Class of 1981
Tulane Class of 1981
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9894
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
two PF's. lets just give them a late score.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
-
- Riptide
- Posts: 4667
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:09 pm
- Location: Bay Area, California
- Status: Offline
Self destruct!
This team is capable of beating itself every way imaginable.
This team is capable of beating itself every way imaginable.
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9894
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
The difference between CJ and other coaches: the Syracuse coach is in the game, watching every second, while CJ just watches the game.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
Absolutely. It's obvious. One guy is in control, the other guy should have just bought a ticket and sat in the End Zone.RobertM320 wrote:The difference between CJ and other coaches: the Syracuse coach is in the game, watching every second, while CJ just watches the game.
+1sader24 wrote:Maybe 10 years ago, where football has gone in the last 10 years those were both obvious calls.tnelly15 wrote:Both of those PF calls were kind of questionable
Even worse in the NFL.
Be proactive, being reactive is for losers..
Tulane Class of 1981
Tulane Class of 1981
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9894
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
And in spite of all the punting woes and this last drive, we should easily have 28 points. The dropped TD on the first drive, and the blocked FG when we should have scored a TD.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9894
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Basically nullifies deferring to the second half.tnelly15 wrote:Of all the shitty things we've done today, giving up a TD on that drive might be the worst.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
We're not there yet. Coaches learning on the job, need an better OL and need tremendous work on the punt team to have a winning year next season.
Be proactive, being reactive is for losers..
Tulane Class of 1981
Tulane Class of 1981
30 yards on Personal Fouls, absolutely no discipline anywhere on this team. Simply suspending people doesn't create discipline. Real discipline means you don't have to suspend people. We are undisciplined in our assignments, actions, reads, etc. We play stupid, we are sloppy, team looks totally lost in all aspects except Nick Montana. CJ looks like a lost fan who wandered into the stadium. Washington looks lost on the sideline. This is totally embarrassing. Coaching, Coaching, Coaching. As bad as the OL is they aren't the reason we are losing. I can take a tough loss at Syracuse, but this is a total disaster.
-
- Riptide
- Posts: 4667
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:09 pm
- Location: Bay Area, California
- Status: Offline
They'll easily score in the sixties, maybe reach 70 even if they call off the dogs.
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9894
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
I have to agree with this 100%. Is this Teevens 2.0? Recruit good talent, do nothing with it?sader24 wrote:30 yards on Personal Fouls, absolutely no discipline anywhere on this team. Simply suspending people doesn't create discipline. Real discipline means you don't have to suspend people. We are undisciplined in our assignments, actions, reads, etc. We play stupid, we are sloppy, team looks totally lost in all aspects except Nick Montana. CJ looks like a lost fan who wandered into the stadium. Washington looks lost on the sideline. This is totally embarrassing. Coaching, Coaching, Coaching. As bad as the OL is they aren't the reason we are losing. I can take a tough loss at Syracuse, but this is a total disaster.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
I subscribe to the belief that you can't learn on the job at this level. While you're learning and getting better, so is everyone else so you're constantly behind. CJ isn't some 35 year old whiz with a tremendous amount of talent and aptitude that has to figure some stuff out. He's in his 50's and been at every level, if he doesn't have it yet, he's not finding it. His best bet is to fire his defensive coordinators and bring in a guy who has it and basically let him run the team while he recruits. I don't think that'll work b/c we don't have the money to bring someone in like that, but this setup isn't working.tpstulane wrote:We're not there yet. Coaches learning on the job, need an better OL and need tremendous work on the punt team to have a winning year next season.