2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

WIN - LOSS PREDICTION (REGULAR SEASON)

12-0
0
No votes
11-1
0
No votes
10-2
0
No votes
9-3
0
No votes
8-4
0
No votes
7-5
2
14%
6-6
3
21%
5-7
7
50%
4-8
2
14%
3-9
0
No votes
2-10
0
No votes
1-11
0
No votes
0-12
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 14
User avatar
nawlinspete
Swell
Posts: 1568
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:43 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby nawlinspete » Sat Aug 26, 2017 3:40 pm

Stop assuming Coach Fritz wants to win AND get the hell out of New Orleans.

What knowledge do you whiners have that others don't ?


Once and Again, With Smart Choices and a Bit Of Patience

Wave755
Swell
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:04 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby Wave755 » Sat Aug 26, 2017 3:56 pm

nawlinspete wrote:Stop assuming Coach Fritz wants to win AND get the hell out of New Orleans.

What knowledge do you whiners have that others don't ?

We are a long way from this for now, but if a P5 like Ole Miss ever offers WF he will take it.



DfromCT
Tsunami
Posts: 5296
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Location: Stamford, CT
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby DfromCT » Sat Aug 26, 2017 7:45 pm

Dog days of summer, LOL, we're all arguing about a new hire coach for a coach that:
1. we don't want to leave
2. Is not on the radar screen of P5 AD's (yet).
3. Has been here 1 year
4. Is 4-10 with one win in the AAC

I'd love to see us go 8-4, which I really think is the cieling for this team. But I'm still thinking 6-6 and next year competing for the AAC West title.


" For every alum, no matter where they are...I want a football coach that's going to make Saturday something you anticipate and look forward to." Troy Dannen

Thank you all for your ongoing support as my son Zach continues to beat leukemia

Aberzombie1892
Swell
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:16 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby Aberzombie1892 » Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:06 pm

DfromCT wrote:Dog days of summer, LOL, we're all arguing about a new hire coach for a coach that:
1. we don't want to leave
2. Is not on the radar screen of P5 AD's (yet).
3. Has been here 1 year
4. Is 4-10 with one win in the AAC

I'd love to see us go 8-4, which I really think is the cieling for this team. But I'm still thinking 6-6 and next year competing for the AAC West title.


Well, Fritz's one bad year wouldn't remove him completely from the radar for a consistently low performing P5 program that has an AD willing to do whatever it can -within the rules- to win (i.e. potentially hire a coach that will use an offense that will likely be unpopular with the fans). As for Tulane, 6-6 is still a tough sell at this point, but that will clear up once the fan base sees how the offense performs against Grambling and Navy.



DfromCT
Tsunami
Posts: 5296
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Location: Stamford, CT
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby DfromCT » Sun Aug 27, 2017 6:08 am

Aberzombie1892 wrote:
DfromCT wrote:Dog days of summer, LOL, we're all arguing about a new hire coach for a coach that:
1. we don't want to leave
2. Is not on the radar screen of P5 AD's (yet).
3. Has been here 1 year
4. Is 4-10 with one win in the AAC

I'd love to see us go 8-4, which I really think is the cieling for this team. But I'm still thinking 6-6 and next year competing for the AAC West title.


Well, Fritz's one bad year wouldn't remove him completely from the radar for a consistently low performing P5 program that has an AD willing to do whatever it can -within the rules- to win (i.e. potentially hire a coach that will use an offense that will likely be unpopular with the fans). As for Tulane, 6-6 is still a tough sell at this point, but that will clear up once the fan base sees how the offense performs against Grambling and Navy.


If he's on their radar screen after going 4-8 in year one at Tulane, why didn't he get a sniff of a P5 job after going undefeated the first year in conference at GSU when it was also their first year at FBS level? His accomplishments at GaSouthern would have been much more impressive than (hypothetically) 4-8 and 8-4 at Tulane.


" For every alum, no matter where they are...I want a football coach that's going to make Saturday something you anticipate and look forward to." Troy Dannen

Thank you all for your ongoing support as my son Zach continues to beat leukemia

Wave755
Swell
Posts: 2261
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:04 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby Wave755 » Sun Aug 27, 2017 8:33 am

DfromCT wrote:
Aberzombie1892 wrote:
DfromCT wrote:Dog days of summer, LOL, we're all arguing about a new hire coach for a coach that:
1. we don't want to leave
2. Is not on the radar screen of P5 AD's (yet).
3. Has been here 1 year
4. Is 4-10 with one win in the AAC

I'd love to see us go 8-4, which I really think is the cieling for this team. But I'm still thinking 6-6 and next year competing for the AAC West title.


Well, Fritz's one bad year wouldn't remove him completely from the radar for a consistently low performing P5 program that has an AD willing to do whatever it can -within the rules- to win (i.e. potentially hire a coach that will use an offense that will likely be unpopular with the fans). As for Tulane, 6-6 is still a tough sell at this point, but that will clear up once the fan base sees how the offense performs against Grambling and Navy.


If he's on their radar screen after going 4-8 in year one at Tulane, why didn't he get a sniff of a P5 job after going undefeated the first year in conference at GSU when it was also their first year at FBS level? His accomplishments at GaSouthern would have been much more impressive than (hypothetically) 4-8 and 8-4 at Tulane.

I just hope we have a QB who can make the pitch and for this season we will truly run a read spread option offense. WF will need a couple of good seasons before people come looking for him.



Aberzombie1892
Swell
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:16 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby Aberzombie1892 » Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:37 am

DfromCT wrote:
Aberzombie1892 wrote:Well, Fritz's one bad year wouldn't remove him completely from the radar for a consistently low performing P5 program that has an AD willing to do whatever it can -within the rules- to win (i.e. potentially hire a coach that will use an offense that will likely be unpopular with the fans). As for Tulane, 6-6 is still a tough sell at this point, but that will clear up once the fan base sees how the offense performs against Grambling and Navy.


If he's on their radar screen after going 4-8 in year one at Tulane, why didn't he get a sniff of a P5 job after going undefeated the first year in conference at GSU when it was also their first year at FBS level? His accomplishments at GaSouthern would have been much more impressive than (hypothetically) 4-8 and 8-4 at Tulane.


Well, Fritz is still a relatively proven commodity at HC in that he has shown can manage a program, so it would make sense for an lower end P5 AD looking to make a safe and justifiable hire of a HC that's won games as HC over a unproven coordinator hire that could easily backfire if that coordinator was not ready. As for his time at Tulane, his first year was a disaster from a W/L point of view, but he improved Tulane's football team enough in various ways in year 1 (i.e. defense) that any AD looking to hire a HC would certainly take note of and give consideration to when reviewing Fritz's resume. Those improvements are why his year 1 at Tulane isn't a resume killer for lower end P5 programs.

As for why a P5 offer did not happen after year 1 in the Sunbelt, it's impossible to know for sure, but there are some factors to consider:
1. GSU was relatively loaded in Sunbelt terms.
2. The Sunbelt was quite weak.
3. GSU was crushed by Navy.
4. GSU did not defeat anyone of relevance.

If, hypothetically speaking, Fritz defeats 6+ teams this season, he will have done so:
1. Against a respectable schedule in a division that should not be too much weaker than the weakest P5 division
2. With a team that is not loaded in AAC terms
3. by defeating at least one team of relevance (likely more than one)



lurker123
Swell
Posts: 1244
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:01 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby lurker123 » Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:11 pm

Aberzombie1892 wrote:
DfromCT wrote:
Aberzombie1892 wrote:Well, Fritz's one bad year wouldn't remove him completely from the radar for a consistently low performing P5 program that has an AD willing to do whatever it can -within the rules- to win (i.e. potentially hire a coach that will use an offense that will likely be unpopular with the fans). As for Tulane, 6-6 is still a tough sell at this point, but that will clear up once the fan base sees how the offense performs against Grambling and Navy.


If he's on their radar screen after going 4-8 in year one at Tulane, why didn't he get a sniff of a P5 job after going undefeated the first year in conference at GSU when it was also their first year at FBS level? His accomplishments at GaSouthern would have been much more impressive than (hypothetically) 4-8 and 8-4 at Tulane.


Well, Fritz is still a relatively proven commodity at HC in that he has shown can manage a program, so it would make sense for an lower end P5 AD looking to make a safe and justifiable hire of a HC that's won games as HC over a unproven coordinator hire that could easily backfire if that coordinator was not ready. As for his time at Tulane, his first year was a disaster from a W/L point of view, but he improved Tulane's football team enough in various ways in year 1 (i.e. defense) that any AD looking to hire a HC would certainly take note of and give consideration to when reviewing Fritz's resume. Those improvements are why his year 1 at Tulane isn't a resume killer for lower end P5 programs.

As for why a P5 offer did not happen after year 1 in the Sunbelt, it's impossible to know for sure, but there are some factors to consider:
1. GSU was relatively loaded in Sunbelt terms.
2. The Sunbelt was quite weak.
3. GSU was crushed by Navy.
4. GSU did not defeat anyone of relevance.

If, hypothetically speaking, Fritz defeats 6+ teams this season, he will have done so:
1. Against a respectable schedule in a division that should not be too much weaker than the weakest P5 division
2. With a team that is not loaded in AAC terms
3. by defeating at least one team of relevance (likely more than one)


His buyout dramatically lowered in fall of his second year at GSU. It was linked to President of GSU staying. President left that September. Not saying without that change, he would still be at GSU but it made recruiting him by Tulane or whoever much easier.



DfromCT
Tsunami
Posts: 5296
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Location: Stamford, CT
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby DfromCT » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:45 pm

In other words, despite doing a WHOLE LOT MORE in his first two years at GSU to get the attention of a P5 AD than he did last year at Tulane, he's more attractive after a horrible looking 4-8 (and yes, we were TRULY UGLY to get to 4-8) than he was after dominating the Sun Belt the first two years GSU was in FBS?

Sorry, but if your selling that, I'm not buying. I think few, if any D1 AD's would be buyers as well. Otherwise he wouldn't have taken the Tulane job, he would have stayed at GSU and gotten a P5 for his accomplishments there.


" For every alum, no matter where they are...I want a football coach that's going to make Saturday something you anticipate and look forward to." Troy Dannen

Thank you all for your ongoing support as my son Zach continues to beat leukemia

winwave
Wild Pelican
Posts: 10728
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 10:34 am
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby winwave » Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:42 pm

I'll go with 5-7.


It's the facilities stupid!

mbawavefan12
Tsunami
Posts: 5096
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:17 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby mbawavefan12 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:37 am

FIU and Cinci looked terrible. No reason why those should not be easy wins.



golfnut69
Tsunami
Posts: 7106
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 9:38 am
Status: Online

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby golfnut69 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 9:28 am

[quote="mbawavefan12"]FIU and Cinci looked terrible. No reason why those should not be wins.[/quote

I note Memphis hung on against Duck Dynasty U


Be a Hero Today.... Adopt a Shelter Pet... The Beatles once sang "Can't Buy Me Love"... I disagree, unconditional Love can be bought, for the nominal adoption fee at your local Pet Shelter !

Aberzombie1892
Swell
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:16 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby Aberzombie1892 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:36 am

mbawavefan12 wrote:FIU and Cinci looked terrible. No reason why those should not be wins.


Well, it was the first game for new coaches at their programs. We have a better idea of how good those teams are, and how good Tulane is, when it's time for them to play Tulane.



User avatar
NOLABigSteve
Riptide
Posts: 2965
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 12:00 am
Location: New Orleans, LA
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby NOLABigSteve » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:24 am

Actually just added a poll to this thread to help us summarize our predictions.


Roll Wave!
Tulane University c/o 2003
Football Defensive End '99, '00, '01, '02
2002 Hawaii Bowl Champions
School of Engineering (Computer Science)

User avatar
RobertM320
Tsunami
Posts: 6092
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
Location: Destrehan, LA
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby RobertM320 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:48 am

I went with 5-7. We're better, but schedule is tougher. Anything better than that and I'll be pleasantly surprised.


"ASK AND YE SHALL RECEIVE! HANG EM AND BANG EM! HANG EM AND BANG EM!"-- Todd Graffagnini

Ruski
Surge
Posts: 601
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:58 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby Ruski » Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:39 pm

AutoNation Cure Bowl

Citrus Bowl Stadium, Orlando
Dec. 16, 2:30 p.m. (CBSSN)

Bonagura: Tulane vs. Louisiana
Hale: SMU vs. Troy


http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/20519226/preseason-college-football-bowl-projections-2017



User avatar
tpstulane
Top of the WAVE
Posts: 16628
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:56 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby tpstulane » Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:03 pm

Hoping 5-7 at this stage


Stadiums get old, winning never does.
Tulane Class of 1981

User avatar
RobertM320
Tsunami
Posts: 6092
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
Location: Destrehan, LA
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby RobertM320 » Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:05 pm

I don't see any way we beat SMU or Houston at this point.


"ASK AND YE SHALL RECEIVE! HANG EM AND BANG EM! HANG EM AND BANG EM!"-- Todd Graffagnini

User avatar
tpstulane
Top of the WAVE
Posts: 16628
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:56 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby tpstulane » Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:10 pm

RobertM320 wrote:I don't see any way we beat SMU or Houston at this point.

Maybe Houston.


Stadiums get old, winning never does.
Tulane Class of 1981

Jaxwave
Surge
Posts: 768
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:14 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby Jaxwave » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:50 am

tpstulane wrote:
RobertM320 wrote:I don't see any way we beat SMU or Houston at this point.

ECU in doubt as well.


All of the remaining teams can pass the football. Not good.



Jaxwave
Surge
Posts: 768
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:14 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction thread

Postby Jaxwave » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:53 am

mbawavefan12 wrote:FIU and Cinci looked terrible. No reason why those should not be wins.


Nice jinx MBA! You actually were correct, but it doesn't take much to jinx Tulane football.



sader24
Tsunami
Posts: 5405
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:35 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby sader24 » Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:57 am

Looks like 3-9, we are worse this year than last. Fritz coaching a high school brand of football.



sader24
Tsunami
Posts: 5405
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:35 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby sader24 » Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:00 am

Recently watched Tulane-LSU 1987 tape, our offense 30 years ago was far more advanced than it is now and that offense was essentially Terrance Jones calling his own plays. LSU was #5 in the country and watching that tape made me realize that Tulane football is done.



User avatar
tpstulane
Top of the WAVE
Posts: 16628
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:56 pm
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby tpstulane » Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:39 pm

Let’s see how we’re doing. My 5-7 is still alive.


Stadiums get old, winning never does.
Tulane Class of 1981

User avatar
RobertM320
Tsunami
Posts: 6092
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
Location: Destrehan, LA
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: 2017 Football Prediction Thread / Poll

Postby RobertM320 » Sat Nov 18, 2017 8:11 pm

sader24 wrote:Looks like 3-9, we are worse this year than last. Fritz coaching a high school brand of football.


This didn't age well.


"ASK AND YE SHALL RECEIVE! HANG EM AND BANG EM! HANG EM AND BANG EM!"-- Todd Graffagnini

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ajcalhoun, ccap05, winwave and 17 guests