Keep calm andnawlinspete wrote: Your recent posts indicate you are concussed. Do not buy anything on line, sign contracts or operate a vehicle.
TROLL ON.
Keep calm andnawlinspete wrote: Your recent posts indicate you are concussed. Do not buy anything on line, sign contracts or operate a vehicle.
Despite your last sentence, the rest makes complete and total sense. Tulane's defense will be good, perhaps very good. Wake's offense will be mediocre, at best (that's kind given their performance last year). I don't even think Wake scores 17 total points.OUG wrote:I have a CBS SportsLine Pro subscription (which is CBS' handicapping and analytics site), for, uh, entertainment purposes...
Anyway, they love the Wave ATS here. Both their data analyst and one of their top handicappers are picking us ATS:
The data analyst says:
TULANE +17
My simulations show this game being much closer than the Vegas odds. Projections have these teams separated by less than 20 total yards, so I have no idea how Wake Forest will be able to beat the big spread if that is indeed the case. With nearly one-third of simulations pointing to a straight-up upset by Tulane, taking the Green Wave to cover is a much easier play.
The handicapper is mostly just fading Wake, based on the size of the spread.
TULANE +17
Wake Forest is a big home favorite for its opener against Tulane after the Demon Deacons' encouraging finish last season. Wake's defense kept the team competitive; the Deacs lost to Florida State, Louisville, Duke and Indiana by eight or fewer points. The Green Wave, meanwhile, lost six of their last seven games in 2015 and their young roster is filled with question marks. But with Wake's propensity for offensive lulls, 17 points is too many. Grab the dog.
The way they index value, they have Tulane +17 as a 98 out of 100, which is their strongest play of the weekend I think.
They also like us on the moneyline, saying we win 33% of simulations. So at +600ish, its a better than average value. The money line is moving toward Tulane, going from +650 to +550 in the past week or so.
Of course their computers have Terren Encalade out for the game and Devin Powell starting for us at QB. So take these computers and picks for what they're worth.
I see people predicting WF to score over 20+ points which is kind of mind boggling. This is the same team last year that averaged less than 17 points per game. They are also breaking in a new running back and qb. So where is all this offensive power coming from?jonathanjoseph wrote:Despite your last sentence, the rest makes complete and total sense. Tulane's defense will be good, perhaps very good. Wake's offense will be mediocre, at best (that's kind given their performance last year). I don't even think Wake scores 17 total points.OUG wrote:I have a CBS SportsLine Pro subscription (which is CBS' handicapping and analytics site), for, uh, entertainment purposes...
Anyway, they love the Wave ATS here. Both their data analyst and one of their top handicappers are picking us ATS:
The data analyst says:
TULANE +17
My simulations show this game being much closer than the Vegas odds. Projections have these teams separated by less than 20 total yards, so I have no idea how Wake Forest will be able to beat the big spread if that is indeed the case. With nearly one-third of simulations pointing to a straight-up upset by Tulane, taking the Green Wave to cover is a much easier play.
The handicapper is mostly just fading Wake, based on the size of the spread.
TULANE +17
Wake Forest is a big home favorite for its opener against Tulane after the Demon Deacons' encouraging finish last season. Wake's defense kept the team competitive; the Deacs lost to Florida State, Louisville, Duke and Indiana by eight or fewer points. The Green Wave, meanwhile, lost six of their last seven games in 2015 and their young roster is filled with question marks. But with Wake's propensity for offensive lulls, 17 points is too many. Grab the dog.
The way they index value, they have Tulane +17 as a 98 out of 100, which is their strongest play of the weekend I think.
They also like us on the moneyline, saying we win 33% of simulations. So at +600ish, its a better than average value. The money line is moving toward Tulane, going from +650 to +550 in the past week or so.
Of course their computers have Terren Encalade out for the game and Devin Powell starting for us at QB. So take these computers and picks for what they're worth.
The point spread is 100% pure Cow/Dick perception and legacy of losing. People expect us to get blown out, even by a team that can't score.
But....But....They are a P-5 Team, and have superior shoes and jerseys and everything !!!!...even their water bottles are cool looking !!!!GreenPuddleSplash wrote:I see people predicting WF to score over 20+ points which is kind of mind boggling. This is the same team last year that averaged less than 17 points per game. They are also breaking in a new running back and qb. So where is all this offensive power coming from?jonathanjoseph wrote:Despite your last sentence, the rest makes complete and total sense. Tulane's defense will be good, perhaps very good. Wake's offense will be mediocre, at best (that's kind given their performance last year). I don't even think Wake scores 17 total points.OUG wrote:I have a CBS SportsLine Pro subscription (which is CBS' handicapping and analytics site), for, uh, entertainment purposes...
Anyway, they love the Wave ATS here. Both their data analyst and one of their top handicappers are picking us ATS:
The data analyst says:
TULANE +17
My simulations show this game being much closer than the Vegas odds. Projections have these teams separated by less than 20 total yards, so I have no idea how Wake Forest will be able to beat the big spread if that is indeed the case. With nearly one-third of simulations pointing to a straight-up upset by Tulane, taking the Green Wave to cover is a much easier play.
The handicapper is mostly just fading Wake, based on the size of the spread.
TULANE +17
Wake Forest is a big home favorite for its opener against Tulane after the Demon Deacons' encouraging finish last season. Wake's defense kept the team competitive; the Deacs lost to Florida State, Louisville, Duke and Indiana by eight or fewer points. The Green Wave, meanwhile, lost six of their last seven games in 2015 and their young roster is filled with question marks. But with Wake's propensity for offensive lulls, 17 points is too many. Grab the dog.
The way they index value, they have Tulane +17 as a 98 out of 100, which is their strongest play of the weekend I think.
They also like us on the moneyline, saying we win 33% of simulations. So at +600ish, its a better than average value. The money line is moving toward Tulane, going from +650 to +550 in the past week or so.
Of course their computers have Terren Encalade out for the game and Devin Powell starting for us at QB. So take these computers and picks for what they're worth.
The point spread is 100% pure Cow/Dick perception and legacy of losing. People expect us to get blown out, even by a team that can't score.
They are not breaking in a new QB tmk. They both stunk last year but played.golfnut69 wrote:But....But....They are a P-5 Team, and have superior shoes and jerseys and everything !!!!...even their water bottles are cool looking !!!!GreenPuddleSplash wrote:I see people predicting WF to score over 20+ points which is kind of mind boggling. This is the same team last year that averaged less than 17 points per game. They are also breaking in a new running back and qb. So where is all this offensive power coming from?jonathanjoseph wrote:Despite your last sentence, the rest makes complete and total sense. Tulane's defense will be good, perhaps very good. Wake's offense will be mediocre, at best (that's kind given their performance last year). I don't even think Wake scores 17 total points.OUG wrote:I have a CBS SportsLine Pro subscription (which is CBS' handicapping and analytics site), for, uh, entertainment purposes...
Anyway, they love the Wave ATS here. Both their data analyst and one of their top handicappers are picking us ATS:
The data analyst says:
TULANE +17
My simulations show this game being much closer than the Vegas odds. Projections have these teams separated by less than 20 total yards, so I have no idea how Wake Forest will be able to beat the big spread if that is indeed the case. With nearly one-third of simulations pointing to a straight-up upset by Tulane, taking the Green Wave to cover is a much easier play.
The handicapper is mostly just fading Wake, based on the size of the spread.
TULANE +17
Wake Forest is a big home favorite for its opener against Tulane after the Demon Deacons' encouraging finish last season. Wake's defense kept the team competitive; the Deacs lost to Florida State, Louisville, Duke and Indiana by eight or fewer points. The Green Wave, meanwhile, lost six of their last seven games in 2015 and their young roster is filled with question marks. But with Wake's propensity for offensive lulls, 17 points is too many. Grab the dog.
The way they index value, they have Tulane +17 as a 98 out of 100, which is their strongest play of the weekend I think.
They also like us on the moneyline, saying we win 33% of simulations. So at +600ish, its a better than average value. The money line is moving toward Tulane, going from +650 to +550 in the past week or so.
Of course their computers have Terren Encalade out for the game and Devin Powell starting for us at QB. So take these computers and picks for what they're worth.
The point spread is 100% pure Cow/Dick perception and legacy of losing. People expect us to get blown out, even by a team that can't score.
I have them scoring over 20 because I think we will hand them some points. We are still a very mistake prone and mentally soft football team, and I think Fritz will fix that, but it's not going to change over night in a road opener. I would say the same if we were playing ULM on the road, btw. It's not about P5. Wake will score points on defense/ST or on a short field, at least once and maybe more.GreenPuddleSplash wrote:I see people predicting WF to score over 20+ points which is kind of mind boggling. This is the same team last year that averaged less than 17 points per game. They are also breaking in a new running back and qb. So where is all this offensive power coming from?jonathanjoseph wrote:Despite your last sentence, the rest makes complete and total sense. Tulane's defense will be good, perhaps very good. Wake's offense will be mediocre, at best (that's kind given their performance last year). I don't even think Wake scores 17 total points.OUG wrote:I have a CBS SportsLine Pro subscription (which is CBS' handicapping and analytics site), for, uh, entertainment purposes...
Anyway, they love the Wave ATS here. Both their data analyst and one of their top handicappers are picking us ATS:
The data analyst says:
TULANE +17
My simulations show this game being much closer than the Vegas odds. Projections have these teams separated by less than 20 total yards, so I have no idea how Wake Forest will be able to beat the big spread if that is indeed the case. With nearly one-third of simulations pointing to a straight-up upset by Tulane, taking the Green Wave to cover is a much easier play.
The handicapper is mostly just fading Wake, based on the size of the spread.
TULANE +17
Wake Forest is a big home favorite for its opener against Tulane after the Demon Deacons' encouraging finish last season. Wake's defense kept the team competitive; the Deacs lost to Florida State, Louisville, Duke and Indiana by eight or fewer points. The Green Wave, meanwhile, lost six of their last seven games in 2015 and their young roster is filled with question marks. But with Wake's propensity for offensive lulls, 17 points is too many. Grab the dog.
The way they index value, they have Tulane +17 as a 98 out of 100, which is their strongest play of the weekend I think.
They also like us on the moneyline, saying we win 33% of simulations. So at +600ish, its a better than average value. The money line is moving toward Tulane, going from +650 to +550 in the past week or so.
Of course their computers have Terren Encalade out for the game and Devin Powell starting for us at QB. So take these computers and picks for what they're worth.
The point spread is 100% pure Cow/Dick perception and legacy of losing. People expect us to get blown out, even by a team that can't score.
Well, their starting QB isn't "new" - 60% accuracy last year (rushed for 261 and 3 tds) and had more interceptions than touchdowns, but was 12-15 for 148 yards and an interception in the spring game so it looks like there may be some improvement at the QB position over the last year. The starting RB is an 3* true freshman early enrollee that beat out a redshirt freshman and a sophomore for that spot (it also looks like Wake will at least cycle in the other two QBs). These guys aren't world beaters, but it wouldn't be surprising to see Wake field a better offense than last year, and, while our defense should be decent, it will be difficult to tell how good it is until Tulane faces ULL (Navy's unique offense and Southern won't be good barometers, while Wake could be a crapshoot depending on what happens with our offense).GreenPuddleSplash wrote:I see people predicting WF to score over 20+ points which is kind of mind boggling. This is the same team last year that averaged less than 17 points per game. They are also breaking in a new running back and qb. So where is all this offensive power coming from?
I agree that it wouldn't be surprising if WF has a better offense, but the same goes for the flip. I wouldn't be surprised if WF's offense is just as bad as last year. They aren't dealing with the same type of problems that we have had, namely, bad coaching. Regardless, kick off is less than 5 hours away. Roll Wave!Aberzombie1892 wrote:Well, their starting QB isn't "new" - 60% accuracy last year (rushed for 261 and 3 tds) and had more interceptions than touchdowns, but was 12-15 for 148 yards and an interception in the spring game so it looks like there may be some improvement at the QB position over the last year. The starting RB is an 3* true freshman early enrollee that beat out a redshirt freshman and a sophomore for that spot (it also looks like Wake will at least cycle in the other two QBs). These guys aren't world beaters, but it wouldn't be surprising to see Wake field a better offense than last year, and, while our defense should be decent, it will be difficult to tell how good it is until Tulane faces ULL (Navy's unique offense and Southern won't be good barometers, while Wake could be a crapshoot depending on what happens with our offense).GreenPuddleSplash wrote:I see people predicting WF to score over 20+ points which is kind of mind boggling. This is the same team last year that averaged less than 17 points per game. They are also breaking in a new running back and qb. So where is all this offensive power coming from?
That's not even looking at possible Tulane turnovers.