Thanks.breaker wrote:Rather than sitting alone in the top row as she normally does at games (not very AD-like), she was chatting up Dr. Stewart, who is on the selection committee. IMO Dr. Stewart should have distanced himself from her while the process is ongoing.
Potential AD candidates search
BAYWAVE&Sophandros are SPINELESS COWARDS
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
YOU NEED LEVERAGE TO BE PROACTIVE!
Small time facilities for small time programs
6-4-23:Now all of the mistakes Tulane has made finally catches up with them as they descend to CUSAAC.
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9893
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
From College AD:
Sources have informed College AD that San Francisco AD Scott Sidwell and Louisiana-Monroe AD Brian Wickstrom are no longer candidates for the Tulane athletic director job. Fletcher Mackel of WDSU is also reporting the Sidwell removed himself from consideration. Sources also tell us that the finalist are expected to be interviewed again next week. College AD is working on further confirmation.
Sources have informed College AD that San Francisco AD Scott Sidwell and Louisiana-Monroe AD Brian Wickstrom are no longer candidates for the Tulane athletic director job. Fletcher Mackel of WDSU is also reporting the Sidwell removed himself from consideration. Sources also tell us that the finalist are expected to be interviewed again next week. College AD is working on further confirmation.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9893
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
I wonder if their use of the singular version "finalist" has any hidden meaning?
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
-
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:54 pm
- Status: Offline
Soooooo the only current candidate is Burke? What a national search. So thorough in their desire to see Tulane succeed.greenie2005 wrote:@FletcherMackel: BREAKING: Scott Sidwell has removed himself as Tulane AD candidate. Focused on continuing great work for USF Dons.
-
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:54 pm
- Status: Offline
Unless, of course, there never was a process and it was Burke all along.breaker wrote:Rather than sitting alone in the top row as she normally does at games (not very AD-like), she was chatting up Dr. Stewart, who is on the selection committee. IMO Dr. Stewart should have distanced himself from her while the process is ongoing.
Which is what any reasonable observer would conclude.
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9893
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
As of Friday, Patulski was interviewing. No report one way or the other on him since. Sidwell and Wickstrom out. Down to either 1, 2 or 3.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
-
- Riptide
- Posts: 4667
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:09 pm
- Location: Bay Area, California
- Status: Offline
RobertM320 wrote:As of Friday, Patulski was interviewing. No report one way or the other on him since. Sidwell and Wickstrom out. Down to either 1, 2 or 3.
Good news that Wickstrom and Sidwell are out. The Bad news is that they were finalists in the first place. Indicates that this search process did not produce many viable candidates. Patulski on paper is by far the most attractive candidate.
JJ, just want to clarify this on the record in advance:
If we hire someone other than Burke, would that mean you were wrong in anyway, or just that you worked so hard to expose the administration's lies that they had no choice to begrudgingly go with Benedict or Patulski?
If we hire someone other than Burke, would that mean you were wrong in anyway, or just that you worked so hard to expose the administration's lies that they had no choice to begrudgingly go with Benedict or Patulski?
True. I forgot Dr Stewart is on the committee.breaker wrote:Rather than sitting alone in the top row as she normally does at games (not very AD-like), she was chatting up Dr. Stewart, who is on the selection committee. IMO Dr. Stewart should have distanced himself from her while the process is ongoing.
Be proactive, being reactive is for losers..
Tulane Class of 1981
Tulane Class of 1981
and stopped the facebook and twitter messaging !!!tpstulane wrote:True. I forgot Dr Stewart is on the committee.breaker wrote:Rather than sitting alone in the top row as she normally does at games (not very AD-like), she was chatting up Dr. Stewart, who is on the selection committee. IMO Dr. Stewart should have distanced himself from her while the process is ongoing.
Be a Hero Today.... Adopt a Shelter Pet... The Beatles once sang "Can't Buy Me Love"... I disagree, unconditional Love can be bought, for the nominal adoption fee at your local Pet Shelter !
It says "are" not "is", so there are multiple people interviewing still.jonathanjoseph wrote:Soooooo the only current candidate is Burke? What a national search. So thorough in their desire to see Tulane succeed.greenie2005 wrote:@FletcherMackel: BREAKING: Scott Sidwell has removed himself as Tulane AD candidate. Focused on continuing great work for USF Dons.
With that being said, here are my thoughts...
I have nothing against Ms. Burke and I'm sure she's a good administrator.
If she was promised the AD job when she was hired then why not just say that when RD announced his retirement? Why drag out this process of a a faux, national search?
If she wasn't promised the AD job, and she is one of the finalist, then I'm officially on board with this "national search" having been done poorly. How could an internal candidate with no FBS experience (prior to Tulane) be the best candidate for the job?
A little help with me comprehending this is appreciated...
-
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:54 pm
- Status: Offline
Yeah it would mean I was wrong about this process.OUG wrote:JJ, just want to clarify this on the record in advance:
If we hire someone other than Burke, would that mean you were wrong in anyway, or just that you worked so hard to expose the administration's lies that they had no choice to begrudgingly go with Benedict or Patulski?
-
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:54 pm
- Status: Offline
1) the faux, national search is typical Cowen-playbook to throw people off the scent that he hired the next AD 18 months ago. Plausible deniability.austxwave wrote: If she was promised the AD job when she was hired then why not just say that when RD announced his retirement? Why drag out this process of a a faux, national search?
If she wasn't promised the AD job, and she is one of the finalist, then I'm officially on board with this "national search" having been done poorly. How could an internal candidate with no FBS experience (prior to Tulane) be the best candidate for the job?
A little help with me comprehending this is appreciated...
2) of course the search was done poorly, as it was never intended to produce anything but the candidate already on the job.
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9893
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
austxwave wrote:I quoted the wrong quote in my reply.RobertM320 wrote:I wonder if their use of the singular version "finalist" has any hidden meaning?
I was being facetious. I know it says "are", but it also uses the singular "finalist". Are you 100% sure which word is truly wrong? Maybe they meant to say the "finalist IS" being interviewed. Don't forget, we are talking Tulane here.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson
Andjonathanjoseph wrote:Yeah it would mean I was wrong about this process.OUG wrote:JJ, just want to clarify this on the record in advance:
If we hire someone other than Burke, would that mean you were wrong in anyway, or just that you worked so hard to expose the administration's lies that they had no choice to begrudgingly go with Benedict or Patulski?
And
"I hope I'm wrong"
come on, you can say it
Just saving this. Carry on.jonathanjoseph wrote:Yeah it would mean I was wrong about this process.OUG wrote:JJ, just want to clarify this on the record in advance:
If we hire someone other than Burke, would that mean you were wrong in anyway, or just that you worked so hard to expose the administration's lies that they had no choice to begrudgingly go with Benedict or Patulski?
God Bless Everyone!
-
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:54 pm
- Status: Offline
I hoped I was wrong 10 years ago. I hope I am wrong today.DrBox wrote:Andjonathanjoseph wrote:Yeah it would mean I was wrong about this process.OUG wrote:JJ, just want to clarify this on the record in advance:
If we hire someone other than Burke, would that mean you were wrong in anyway, or just that you worked so hard to expose the administration's lies that they had no choice to begrudgingly go with Benedict or Patulski?
And
"I hope I'm wrong"
come on, you can say it
-
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:54 pm
- Status: Offline
Cool. Just wondering, do you "save" all the times people called me a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist and I turned out to be right too?ajcalhoun wrote:Just saving this. Carry on.jonathanjoseph wrote:Yeah it would mean I was wrong about this process.OUG wrote:JJ, just want to clarify this on the record in advance:
If we hire someone other than Burke, would that mean you were wrong in anyway, or just that you worked so hard to expose the administration's lies that they had no choice to begrudgingly go with Benedict or Patulski?
-
- Riptide
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:26 pm
- Status: Offline
Having Barbara Burke sitting at the WBB game and socializing with a member of the committee (Dr. Stewart) is both disheartening and extremely unprofessional. You really have to wonder what goes through the heads of this committee. Don't they ever get tired of the same thing? As for Barbara Burke, why would she want a job where she will be instantly hated by so many? What sort of arrogance does it take to put yourself in that position? If she is that good of an AD, she will have no trouble finding a good job elsewhere. Tulane has been botching these decisions for decades; why not try bringing in someone who has had success somewhere? What do we REALLY know about Barbara Burke's reputation at Eastern Illinois? Were they disappointed or relieved that she was leaving?
-
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:54 pm
- Status: Offline
Of course it's unprofessional and disheartening. Those two adjectives well sum up the Cowen/Dickson era of Tulane Athletics.anEngineer wrote:Having Barbara Burke sitting at the WBB game and socializing with a member of the committee (Dr. Stewart) is both disheartening and extremely unprofessional. You really have to wonder what goes through the heads of this committee. Don't they ever get tired of the same thing? As for Barbara Burke, why would she want a job where she will be instantly hated? What sort of arrogance does it take to put yourself in that position. If she is that good of an AD, she will have no trouble finding a good job elsewhere. Tulane has been botching these decisions for decades; why not try bringing in someone who has had success somewhere? What do we REALLY know about Barbara Burke's reputation at Eastern Illinois? Were they disappointed or relieved that she was leaving?
Burke was hired for this job 18 months ago, because no one else was going to hire her, and because Cowen thinks he can control her. Just like CJ, and like Conroy, etc.
It's not just that they are botching the decision, but the reckless abandon with which they spend six figures on a dog and pony show that doesn't even give the appearance of a "national search", just so they can keep pi$$ing on alumni, telling them it's raining and please donate to the cause before you get out of the rain.
-
- Wild Pelican
- Posts: 13030
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:50 pm
- Location: Stamford, CT
- Status: Offline
You know, at some point, JJ, you've gone overboard and might be finding that tin foil hat under the bed with the fuzz balls. I agree with a lot of what you say, and am all over this board about Burke being hired as the AD in Waiting 18 months ago, and why we don't like that. But this statement is just too much.jonathanjoseph wrote:
Burke was hired for this job 18 months ago, because no one else was going to hire her, and because Cowen thinks he can control her. Just like CJ, and like Conroy, etc.
Sometimes I read your posts and think that if we re-hired Sandy Barbour, or Dr. Kevin White, or Chet Gladchuk, you'd find fault in the hire. Ever heard of beating a dead horse? Hiring her as the AD-in-Waiting and going through a farce of a search hardly makes for a headline grabbing conspiracy. It's just Cowen's way of doing things, and controlling the hell hole of an Athletics Program he's ruined at Tulane long after he's not holding the title of President of the University.
" If you laugh, you think, and you cry, that's a full day.." Jimmy V
-
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:54 pm
- Status: Offline
This helps explain why we're in the mess we're in. You say this as if it's a somehow a viable option, much less a palatable one. As if university Presidents aren't just employees, but unchecked emperors who still should be able to unilaterally choose the university's senior administration years after "retirement".DfromCT wrote:You know, at some point, JJ, you've gone overboard and might be finding that tin foil hat under the bed with the fuzz balls. I agree with a lot of what you say, and am all over this board about Burke being hired as the AD in Waiting 18 months ago, and why we don't like that. But this statement is just too much.jonathanjoseph wrote:
Burke was hired for this job 18 months ago, because no one else was going to hire her, and because Cowen thinks he can control her. Just like CJ, and like Conroy, etc.
Sometimes I read your posts and think that if we re-hired Sandy Barbour, or Dr. Kevin White, or Chet Gladchuk, you'd find fault in the hire. Ever heard of beating a dead horse? Hiring her as the AD-in-Waiting and going through a farce of a search hardly makes for a headline grabbing conspiracy. It's just Cowen's way of doing things, and controlling the hell hole of an Athletics Program he's ruined at Tulane long after he's not holding the title of President of the University.
It's absolutely a conspiracy. It's absolutely inappropriate. Someone unaffiliated with Tulane sent me a message today saying "Unbelievable. A major organization run like a dysfunctional family business". That about sums it up. There are supposed to be corporate governance mechanisms in place to ensure such madness can't happen.
I know nothing of Ms. Burke, but I know that she made her career bet by getting into bed with Cowen, and as they say when you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.
- Show Me
- Tsunami
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: Saint Bernard
- Status: Offline
If Burke is hired than 99% of the remaining fan base will believe the fix is in. Already some media believe this. It's hard to believe a national search told us the best AD candidate has been sitting down the hall from Dickson all this time that was hired by Scott Cowen.
Tulane will hire Burke because it will be cheap. She can get a little bump in salary as AD. Tulane can than promote from within someone cheap for her old COO job and then go from there. Credit Sader and JJ for predicting this 18 months ago when Cowen brought her in to keep control of the athletic dept. The fix is in my friends.
This is disgusting.
Tulane will hire Burke because it will be cheap. She can get a little bump in salary as AD. Tulane can than promote from within someone cheap for her old COO job and then go from there. Credit Sader and JJ for predicting this 18 months ago when Cowen brought her in to keep control of the athletic dept. The fix is in my friends.
This is disgusting.
That won't be necessary. You'll remind us.jonathanjoseph wrote: Cool. Just wondering, do you "save" all the times people called me a tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorist and I turned out to be right too?
God Bless Everyone!