one of the few , if U lose, U get a higher ranking
https://collegefootballnews.com/2018/10 ... ngs-week-6
and still goin' to a bowl
https://collegefootballnews.com/2018/10 ... ter-week-6
CFN's week 6 Rankings & Bowl Projections
-
- Swell
- Posts: 2352
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:16 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Status: Offline
The AAC West is bad, but I'm still not confident that Tulane can capitalize on that. Navy, SMU, and Tulsa -should- all be wins given their poor performances so far, but, of course, that was said about UAB.
Even if Tulane won those games, it still would not be a "good" team.
Even if Tulane won those games, it still would not be a "good" team.
- RobertM320
- Green Wave
- Posts: 9887
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:18 pm
- Location: Covington, LA
- Contact:
- Status: Offline
Don't miss the bigger picture. Everyone has said players want to win. So in this case, if we can get to 6-6 and win a bowl game, we end up 7-6. Players don't see the underlying factors as much as we do. They would see a program were freshmen are playing and yet we've improved three years in a row and made a bowl game. That will help recruiting. And 20 years from now you'll see 7-6, and won't remember if it was a "good" 7-6 or a "bad" 7-6 team.Aberzombie1892 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 08, 2018 1:09 pm The AAC West is bad, but I'm still not confident that Tulane can capitalize on that. Navy, SMU, and Tulsa -should- all be wins given their poor performances so far, but, of course, that was said about UAB.
Even if Tulane won those games, it still would not be a "good" team.
"That mantra is the only consistent thing that never needs to ever change for the rest of this program’s existence because that is all that matters & as long as that keeps occurring, everything will handle itself" -- Nick Anderson